Questrade - Empowering you to take control of your financial future. Join the journey!

---

What is the difference between an actively managed and a passively managed ETF?​

---

The primary difference between an actively managed and a passively managed ETF lies in how the fund’s portfolio is managed and its investment strategy.

1. Passively Managed ETFs
​

• Objective: Passively managed ETFs aim to replicate the performance of a specific market index, such as the S&P 500, the NASDAQ-100, or a sector index like the FTSE Global All Cap Index. They do this by holding a portfolio of securities that mirrors the composition of the underlying index.
• Management Approach: These ETFs follow a "buy and hold" strategy, which means the fund manager makes little to no changes to the holdings, except to rebalance the fund as needed to match the index. There is no active selection of individual securities based on market conditions.
• Cost: Passively managed ETFs typically have lower expense ratios since there’s less active research, analysis, and frequent trading involved. Fewer management fees and trading costs make them cost-effective for long-term investors.
• Example: The SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY), which tracks the S&P 500 Index.

Advantages of Passively Managed ETFs:
​

• Lower Fees: Minimal management and trading reduce costs.
• Consistent with Market: They closely follow the market or index, so you’re likely to get returns aligned with the broader market.
• Tax Efficiency: Less trading within the fund generally leads to lower capital gains distributions, making them more tax-efficient.

2. Actively Managed ETFs

• Objective: Actively managed ETFs aim to outperform the market or a specific benchmark. The portfolio manager actively selects, buys, and sells securities based on research, market analysis, and specific investment strategies to achieve better-than-average returns.
• Management Approach: Managers of actively managed ETFs make strategic decisions to adjust the portfolio, based on market conditions, company fundamentals, economic trends, and forecasts. They actively buy and sell stocks, bonds, or other assets in an effort to capture higher returns.
• Cost: Since active management involves more research, analysis, and frequent trading, expense ratios are typically higher compared to passively managed ETFs. These fees cover the costs of the manager’s expertise and trading activity.
• Example: The ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK), which is actively managed and focuses on disruptive innovation companies like those in the tech and biotech sectors.

Advantages of Actively Managed ETFs:

• Potential for Higher Returns: If the manager’s strategy is successful, actively managed ETFs may outperform the broader market or index, delivering higher returns.
• Flexibility: Active managers have the flexibility to adjust holdings in response to market conditions, economic developments, or company performance, potentially avoiding downturns or capitalizing on emerging trends.
• Access to Specialized Expertise: Investors get exposure to the expertise and decision-making of professional managers who use their research and experience to select investments.

Which Is Better for Investors?
​

• Passively Managed ETFs are ideal for long-term, cost-conscious investors who want to match the market’s performance with low fees. They are simple, transparent, and provide broad diversification with minimal risk of underperformance compared to the index.
• Actively Managed ETFs are better suited for investors who are willing to take on additional risk in exchange for the possibility of outperforming the market. These investors trust the fund manager’s expertise to select winning securities, especially in niche markets or sectors.

In summary, passively managed ETFs track an index with low costs, while actively managed ETFs seek to beat the market by making strategic, research-driven investment decisions, often with higher costs and greater risk.

---